Thorchain, a blockchain known for its interoperability features, is facing a wave of developer resignations amid allegations that hackers from North Korea’s Lazarus Group have been using the network to launder stolen funds as money laundering. The situation escalated after a core contributor, known as TCB, warned that Thorchain could face severe consequences if it continues to be framed as a platform for money laundering.
Centralization Concerns Threaten Thorchain’s Credibility
Thorchain was designed as a permissionless, decentralized protocol that allows users to swap native assets across multiple blockchains. However, according to TCB, a small group of corporate actors control the protocol’s infrastructure rather than a truly decentralized network of validators. This centralization contradicts Thorchain’s stated mission and has made it vulnerable to regulatory scrutiny.

TCB claimed that Thorchain’s reliance on a limited number of validators makes it difficult to onboard new operators and maintain a decentralized network. Unlike major blockchains like Ethereum and Bitcoin, which have thousands of independent validators, Thorchain’s validator set is tightly controlled and limited. Efforts to expand the validator pool and implement lighter node solutions have faced resistance, further exposing the protocol to external pressure.
Money Laundering Allegations Put Thorchain at Risk
The crisis deepened after the Bybit hack on February 21, which resulted in $1.5 billion in stolen Ethereum. Lazarus Group, a North Korean hacking organization, reportedly used Thorchain’s infrastructure to obscure the stolen funds. In response, developers including TCB, Pluto, and Oleg Petrov took the unusual step of halting ETH trading on Thorchain.

While this action may have temporarily disrupted illicit activity, TCB stated that it also highlighted the protocol’s vulnerabilities.
“Thorchain’s current setup leaves it open to being framed as a money laundering facilitator,” TCB said.
He added that without meaningful changes, the network risks being cut off from legitimate liquidity sources and could face increased regulatory scrutiny.
Repercussions from Developers Stepping Down
Thorchain’s unofficial lead developer, Pluto, recently announced his resignation, and TCB himself has indicated that he may also leave unless the protocol takes immediate steps to address the situation. The loss of these key contributors has raised questions about Thorchain’s future.
With fewer developers maintaining and improving the network, Thorchain could struggle to keep up with evolving regulatory requirements and technical challenges. The departure of core contributors also damages the protocol’s reputation and may deter new developers from joining the project.
Regulatory Pressure and Industry Trends
Thorchain’s troubles come as regulators worldwide crack down on platforms that fail to prevent illicit financial activity. In the face of such scrutiny, other protocols like Chainflip have implemented stricter transaction filtering at the network level. Thorchain’s resistance to similar measures has left it out of step with industry trends, making it more vulnerable to enforcement actions.
TCB emphasized that Thorchain’s failure to address these issues could have serious consequences.
“If most transaction flows consist of stolen funds linked to a sanctioned state actor, this goes beyond governance and becomes a national security concern,” he warned.
Conclusion on Thorchain Money Laundering
Thorchain’s developer exodus and the allegations of North Korean money laundering have placed the protocol at a crossroads. The loss of key contributors and growing regulatory scrutiny threaten its ability to operate as a stable, decentralized network. Without swift action to address centralization, improve security measures, and regain trust, Thorchain may face a crisis that could jeopardize its future. Keep following Turkishnyradio and keep an eye on Thorchain money laundering concerns.
FAQs
Q: What is Thorchain?
A: Thorchain is a blockchain protocol designed for swapping native assets across multiple blockchains without using wrapped tokens or centralized exchanges.
Q: Why are developers leaving Thorchain?
A: Developers are resigning due to concerns over centralization, regulatory scrutiny, and the protocol’s role in facilitating illicit activities, including money laundering.
Glossary of Key Terms
- Lazarus Group: A North Korean state-sponsored hacking organization known for cyberattacks and cryptocurrency theft.
- Bybit Hack: A significant security breach that resulted in the theft of $1.5 billion in Ethereum.
- Validators: Entities responsible for verifying transactions and maintaining the integrity of a blockchain network.
- Decentralization: The distribution of authority and decision-making power across a network rather than being controlled by a single central entity.
- Censorship-Resistance: A characteristic of blockchain networks that ensures transactions cannot be blocked or reversed by a central authority.
References